Concentric Vs Eccentric Reducer

Table of Content
- What is a Pipe Reducer?
- Pipe Reducer Specification
- What is a Concentric Reducer?
- What is a Eccentric Reducer?
- Concentric vs Eccentric Reducer: What’s the Difference?
- When To Use Eccentric Vs Concentric Reducer?
- Design of Concentric Reducer VS Eccentric Reducer
- How to Choose the Right Con Vs Ecc Reducer for Your Application?
- Concentric and Eccentric Reducer Symbol
- Concentric and Eccentric Reducer Application
- Advantages of Ecc vs Conc Reducer
- ASME B16.9 Reducer Dimensions
- Difference Between Con Reducer and Eccentric Reducer Weight
Pipe reducer are most common types of pipe fittings that can be used to control the flow within a piping system. Two main types of ASME B16.9 reducer: (1) concentric reducer and (2) eccentric reducer. Also check difference between concentric vs eccentric reducer.

Cone shaped concentric reducer means the pipes have matched center lines and the ecc shaped eccentric pipe reducer has mis matched center lines. Stainless steel concentric reducer design is ideal for vertical pipelines. Concentric pipe reducer is most popular ASME B16.9 reducer used in piping industry, because con reducer aren’t going to need one side of the reducer to remain flat.

Eccentric reducer is a pipe fitting used to connect two pipe of different diameter and different sizes. ASME B16.9 eccentric reducer are used when the pipes have to maintain the same bottom or top level. Stainless steel eccentric reducer ideal for horizontal pipelines.
Find Difference Between Concentric Reducer and Eccentric Reducer
Concentric vs Eccentric Reducer: What’s the Difference?

When To Use Eccentric Vs Concentric Reducer?
| When to Use Con Reducer | When to Use Ecc Reducer |
| Maintain centered flow | Need to prevent air pockets |
| Dealing with vertical systems | Managing sediment prone systems |
| Transporting gases or liquids | Protect pumps at suction points |
| Smooth transitions in pump discharge lines | Alignment on pipe racks |
Browse Design Features of Con and Ecc Reducer as per ASME B16.9
Design of Concentric Reducer VS Eccentric Reducer

How to Choose the Right Con Vs Ecc Reducer for Your Application?
- Pipeline Orientation = Horizontal and Vertical
- Type of Fluid = Liquids with Gas and Clean Liquids
- Pump Protection = Prevent Vapor and Cavitation Lock
- Flow and Pressure Requirements = High Pressure
Concentric and Eccentric Reducer Symbol
| Concentric Reducer Symbol | Eccentric Reducer Symbol |
![]() |
![]() |
Concentric and Eccentric Reducer Application
| Concentric Pipe Reducer Application | Eccentric Pipe Reducer Application |
| Chemical Processing | Slurry Transport |
| Oil and Gas | Chemical Processing |
| Water Treatment | Pumping Systems |
| HVAC Systems | Wastewater Systems |
| Oil Transportation Pipeline | Best for Horizontal Pipeline |
Discover Advantages of Eccentric vs Concentric Pipe Reducer
Advantages of Ecc vs Conc Reducer
| Advantages of Butt Weld Concentric Reducer | Advantages of Butt Weld Eccentric Reducer |
| Uniform Flow | Flow Control |
| Cost-Effectiveness | Air Pocket Prevention |
| Space Efficiency | Sediment Handling |

| NPS | Length H | O.D. D | O.D. D1 |
| 26 – 22 | 610 | 660 | 559 |
| 26 – 20 | 610 | 660 | 508 |
| 26 – 18 | 610 | 660 | 457 |
| 24 – 20 | 508 | 610 | 508 |
| 24 – 18 | 508 | 610 | 457 |
| 22 – 20 | 508 | 559 | 508 |
| 22 – 18 | 508 | 559 | 457 |
| 22 – 16 | 508 | 559 | 406.4 |
| 20 – 18 | 508 | 508 | 457 |
| 20 – 16 | 508 | 508 | 406.4 |
| 20 – 12 | 508 | 508 | 323.9 |
| 18 – 16 | 381 | 457 | 406.4 |
| 18 – 12 | 381 | 457 | 323.9 |
| 18 – 10 | 381 | 457 | 273 |
| 16 – 12 | 356 | 406.4 | 323.9 |
| 16 – 10 | 356 | 406.4 | 273 |
| 14 – 12 | 330 | 355.6 | 323.9 |
| 14 – 10 | 330 | 355.6 | 273 |
| 14 – 8 | 330 | 355.6 | 219.1 |
| 12 – 10 | 203 | 323.9 | 273 |
| 12 – 8 | 203 | 323.9 | 219.1 |
| 12 – 5 | 203 | 323.9 | 141.3 |
| 10 – 8 | 178 | 273 | 219.1 |
| 10 – 5 | 178 | 273 | 141.3 |
| 10 – 4 | 178 | 273 | 114.3 |
| 8 – 5 | 152 | 219.1 | 141.3 |
| 8 – 4 | 152 | 219.1 | 114.3 |
| 6 – 2.1/2 | 140 | 168.3 | 73 |
| 5 – 4 | 127 | 141.3 | 114.3 |
| 5 – 3 | 127 | 141.3 | 88.9 |
| 5 – 2 | 127 | 141.3 | 60.3 |
| 4 – 3.1/2 | 102 | 114.3 | 101.6 |
| 3.1/2 – 2.1/2 | 102 | 101.6 | 73 |
| 3.1/2 – 2 | 102 | 101.6 | 60.3 |
| 3 – 2 | 89 | 88.9 | 60.3 |
| 3 – 1.1/2 | 89 | 88.9 | 48.3 |
| 2.1/2 – 2 | 89 | 73 | 60.3 |
| 2.1/2 – 1.1/2 | 89 | 73 | 48.3 |
| 2 – 1 | 76 | 60.3 | 33.4 |
| 2 – 3/4 | 76 | 60.3 | 26.7 |
| 1.1/2 – 1 | 64 | 48.3 | 33.4 |
| 1.1/2 – 3/4 | 64 | 48.3 | 26.7 |
| 1.1/4 – 1 | 51 | 42.2 | 33.4 |
| 1 – 3/4 | 51 | 33.4 | 26.7 |
| 1 – 1/2 | 51 | 33.4 | 21.3 |
Difference Between Con Reducer and Eccentric Reducer Weight
| NPS | Weight in (KG) Schedule STD |
| 24-18 | 67.13 |
| 24-20 | 68.04 |
| 22-16 | 59.42 |
| 22-18 | 62.6 |
| 20-12 | 54.43 |
| 20-16 | 56.25 |
| 20-18 | 56.7 |
| 16-8 | 31.07 |
| 16-12 | 31.75 |
| 14-6 | 26.31 |
| 12-10 | 15.42 |
| 10-5 | 9.53 |
| 10-6 | 9.75 |
| 8-3.1/2 | 4.99 |
| 8-4 | 4.99 |
| 8-6 | 5.99 |
| 6-3 | 3.63 |
| 6-4 | 3.74 |
| 5-2 | 2.27 |
| 5-2.1/2 | 2.38 |
| 5-3.1/2 | 2.61 |
| 4-2 | 1.36 |
| 4-3.1/2 | 1.59 |
| 3.1/2-2 | 1.25 |
| 3.1/2-2.1/2 | 1.31 |
| 3-1.1/4 | 0.73 |
| 3-1.1/2 | 0.77 |
| 3-2 | 0.82 |
| 2.1/2-1.1/4 | 0.57 |
| 2.1/2-2 | 0.68 |
| 2-3/4 | 0.32 |
| 2-1 | 0.34 |
| 2-1.1/4 | 0.38 |
| 2-1.1/2 | 0.41 |
| 1.1/2-1/2 | 0.23 |
| 1.1/2-1 | 0.28 |
| 1.1/4-1/2 | 0.18 |
| 1.1/4-1 | 0.23 |
| 1-1/2 | 0.18 |
| 1-3/4 | 0.18 |
| 3/4-1/2 | 0.08 |





















